Most ASX and NSX junior explorers that carry out eligible research and development activity claim the R&D Tax Incentive (RDTI) refund from the ATO once a year. When it lands, it is often the biggest single cash receipt the entity sees all year, sometimes larger than the quarter's entire operating spend. It is also one of the most consistently misclassified lines on the Appendix 5B, because the R&D expenditure that earned the refund is frequently sitting in a completely different section of the form.
The Appendix 5B has a dedicated line for it: item 1.7, "Government grants and tax incentives," in Section 1, cash flows from operating activities. The trap is that the R&D spend behind the refund was often capitalised as exploration and evaluation (E&E) expenditure under AASB 6, which sits in Section 2, not Section 1. That mismatch is exactly what leads preparers to net the refund against Section 2, when the form asks for something simpler.
The rule: classify by what the receipt is, not by what it relates to
AASB 107, the accounting standard behind the cash flow statement, classifies a cash flow by its own nature, not by matching it to the expense it happens to offset. The RDTI refund is a government tax incentive received in cash. That fact alone puts it in item 1.7, in full, every time. It does not matter whether the underlying R&D expenditure was:
- expensed as incurred in Section 1 (staff costs, administration, exploration and evaluation costs not capitalised), or
- capitalised into E&E under the entity's AASB 6 policy and reported in Section 2, item 2.1(d).
Either way, the refund itself is still an operating cash inflow under item 1.7. Netting it against the Section 2 capitalised balance, because "that's the spend it came from," is the single most common way this line goes wrong.
Why it matters for Section 8
This is not a cosmetic classification issue. Section 8 draws its inputs directly from items 1.9 and 2.1(d): net operating cash flow (8.1) and capitalised exploration and evaluation (8.2) feed the total relevant outgoings figure that determines the entity's estimated quarters of funding (8.7). If the RDTI refund is incorrectly netted into Section 2 instead of sitting in Section 1, both 8.1 and 8.2 are distorted, and the runway calculation the market reads is built on a misclassified number, even though the total cash position is unaffected.
For an explorer whose RDTI refund arrives in a quarter close to the 2-quarter funding threshold, this is not an academic point. A refund misclassified into Section 2 changes the size of the number in item 8.2, which changes 8.3, which changes 8.7, which determines whether the mandatory 8.8 disclosures are triggered.
Quick reference
| Cash flow | Correct Appendix 5B item |
|---|---|
| RDTI refund received from the ATO | 1.7 (Section 1, operating) |
| R&D expenditure expensed as incurred | 1.2(a)–(e), as applicable (Section 1) |
| R&D expenditure capitalised as E&E | 2.1(d) (Section 2, investing) |
| Netting the refund against 2.1(d) | Incorrect, regardless of the amount |
The Xero setup that keeps it straight
The fix is a chart of accounts decision made once, not a judgement call remade every year under deadline pressure:
- Give it its own GL account. A dedicated income code such as "Government Grants & Tax Incentives," separate from any E&E capitalisation code and separate from customer revenue.
- Code the receipt gross. The ATO payment goes to that account in full. It is never netted against R&D expenditure paid during the year, capitalised or not.
- Tag it as operating, not investing. If tracking categories or cost centres are used to help map transactions to 5B sections, this account should carry the same operating tag as other Section 1 items, not the E&E tag used for Section 2.
- Write the rule down. One line in the entity's AASB 6 capitalisation policy: "Government grants and tax incentives received in cash are recognised in Section 1, item 1.7, regardless of the classification of the underlying expenditure." A written rule survives a change of bookkeeper. A remembered one does not.
Once the GL structure reflects this, an automated 5B mapping reads the account and applies the rule the same way every quarter, whether it is the entity's first RDTI refund or its fifth, without anyone having to recall the AASB 107 nature-of-receipt test while the deadline is two days out.
Where to start
- Check your chart of accounts for a dedicated grants and tax incentives income code, separate from any E&E capitalisation account.
- Pull your last lodged 5B and confirm the RDTI refund sits in item 1.7, not netted into Section 2.
- Add the one-line classification rule to your written AASB 6 policy so the next preparer does not have to work it out from first principles.
- If the refund is due again this financial year, flag the quarter it is expected in now, so the Section 8 runway conversation is not a surprise when it lands.
Want your last lodged 5B checked for this?
We can run our Appendix 5B automation on your prior quarter's Xero data and flag whether the RDTI refund, or any other grant, is sitting in the right section. No pitch, no obligation.
📅 Book a 20-minute call →
Syed Samir Ahmad
Founder, Genius Accounting Solutions
CA ANZ | MBA | Salesforce Certified (4x) | Xero Partner